As any unsuccessful political candidate can attest, it’s not simple to study from loss. As any nonprofit supervisor can attest, it is extremely tough to study from the lack of repute, neighborhood assist and funding that may consequence from wrongdoing that causes hurt to a service recipient, volunteer and even worker. Learning from disasters is important, even when it’s painful.

At a nonprofit danger summit, Melanie Herman, govt director of the Nonprofit Risk Management Center, and Aaron Lundberg, president and CEO of Praesidium, examined the the reason why it’s so exhausting to find out the “why” when one thing goes horribly incorrect. They referred to case of a volunteer coach who was found to have sexually abused a nine-year-old boy, a case that triggered Praesidium to return into existence.

    So, why is it exhausting to study from loss? Herman and Lundberg provided a number of easy and even obvious, however compelling, causes. The audio system quoted Sidney Dekker, a professor at Griffith University in Australia, who additionally based the Safety Science Innovation Lab:

  • We look for easy reasonably than exhausting, however truthful, explanations.
  • We favor backwards-looking accountability.
  • We fear that dwelling on losses will exacerbate mission hurt.
  • “Multiple, overlapping interpretations of the identical act or occasion are at all times doable, and could be obligatory” (the audio system quoted Sidney Dekker).

This article sources info from Management Tips – The NonProfit Times

This article sources info from Donors.Today