This Small Business Owner Doesn’t Want Handouts for Being a Woman within the Construction Industry. She Wants Tax Reform.

SPRINGFIELD, Missouri—Mary Beth Hartman has by no means referred to as herself a feminist. “But I do imagine that ladies can compete with males, and I don’t imagine that we now have to be on the market beating our chest or our drums, or doing a march, to get it completed,” she informed The Daily Signal from her workplace in Missouri.

Fifteen years in the past, Hartman began a heavy freeway building enterprise, Hunter-Chase & Associates. Entering a male-dominated trade isn’t simple, she mentioned, but it surely’s doable. And as a substitute of handouts for being a girl in a person’s world, Hartman mentioned she desires tax reform.

“I wish to compete on the identical floor as all of my male rivals,” Hartman mentioned. “And I imagine tax reform can propel me to that degree.”

Learn extra about Hartman’s story and why as a small enterprise proprietor she helps tax reform within the video above.

The submit This Small Business Owner Doesn’t Want Handouts for Being a Woman within the Construction Industry. She Wants Tax Reform. appeared first on The Daily Signal.

This article sources data from The Daily Signal

Most Retirees Would Save Money Because of Tax Reform. Here Are Some Key Examples.

Most Retirees Would Save Money Because of Tax Reform. Here Are Some Key Examples.

The proposed House and Senate tax reform payments that lawmakers are at present merging into one would imply tax cuts for many Americans. Nevertheless, change—even good change—can result in uncertainty.

Retirees would be the most involved about what tax reform will imply for them, as most depend on comparatively fastened incomes.

But in actual fact, the proposed reforms are principally excellent news for retirees. For probably the most half, they’d be much less affected than different Americans, because the proposed reforms wouldn’t change the best way Social Security and funding earnings are taxed.

Many retirees would in actual fact profit from the tax payments’ doubling the dimensions of the usual deduction.

While seniors’ earnings and pension earnings could be topic to new particular person earnings tax brackets and charges, these adjustments would truly imply tax cuts—not will increase—for an amazing majority of seniors and retirees.

There are three provisions within the tax reform payments that would notably have an effect on retirees:

1. Medical Expenses Deduction

Currently, anybody who has excessive medical bills can deduct the portion of these bills that exceeds 10 % of their earnings. So a pair who earns $40,000 in earnings and has $10,000 in medical bills can deduct $6,000 of these bills.

The House invoice eliminates this deduction, however the Senate invoice maintains it and will increase the deductible quantity to over 7.5 % of earnings for 2017 and 2018. In the above instance, this is able to imply a $7,000 deduction.

2. Personal and Elderly Deductions

Currently, along with claiming a $4,zero50 private exemption, folks over 65 can even declare a $1,250 blind or aged deduction. Both payments eradicate the private exemption and exchange it with a roughly doubled commonplace deduction.

The House proposal eliminates the aged deduction, whereas the Senate invoice maintains it.

3. Other Itemized Deductions

Two of the deductions which have obtained probably the most consideration are adjustments to state and native taxes and mortgage curiosity. Both the House and Senate payments eradicate the state and native tax deduction and cap the property tax deduction at $10,000.

For mortgage curiosity, the Senate invoice maintains present coverage whereas the House invoice caps the mortgage curiosity deduction at $500,000, however just for new residence purchases. These deductions are inclined to have much less influence on retirees who usually haven’t any mortgage or are far sufficient alongside of their mortgage funds that they’ve little mortgage curiosity.

Retirees usually even have decrease state and native earnings taxes as a result of not all of their earnings is topic to taxation.

To illustrate simply how the House and Senate tax reform packages would have an effect on totally different retirees, contemplate these 5 examples.

Evelyn Thompson

Evelyn is a retired waitress and a widow. She receives an average-level Social Security advantage of $16,000 per yr, in addition to $11,000 from her husband’s 401(okay). She has $10,000 in medical bills.

Evelyn’s tax invoice won’t change underneath the proposed reforms. She doesn’t pay something underneath the present tax system, and she or he wouldn’t pay something underneath the reform proposals as a result of they don’t change the taxation of Social Security advantages or funding earnings.

Moreover, the proposed will increase in the usual deduction, coupled with decrease tax charges, make up for her lack of the medical expense deduction within the House proposal.

Phillip Olson

Phillip is a retired utility employee. He earned a median earnings all through his profession, however now receives a major pension and even saved a bit on his personal by way of a 401(okay).

His mixed retirement earnings is $50,000 a yr, consisting of $16,000 in Social Security advantages, a $28,000 pension, and $4,000 in 401(okay) earnings. Phil has $7,500 in medical bills, and he at present pays $3,988 in federal taxes.

Phil’s tax invoice would go down by $232 underneath the House’s proposal (to $3,756) and by $572 underneath the Senate proposal (to $3,416). This would imply a 5.8 % tax lower underneath the House proposal and a 14.4 % tax lower underneath the Senate proposal.

These tax cuts would come from decrease marginal tax charges on his $28,000 in pension earnings. In addition, no adjustments could be made to the taxation of Phil’s $18,000 in Social Security advantages, or his $4,000 in 401(okay) earnings.

Although Phil has $7,500 in medical bills, the upper commonplace deductions underneath the House and Senate payments make it not worthwhile for him to deduct these bills, that means he would face much less paperwork and a less complicated tax-filing course of. Phil would additionally profit from decrease tax charges on his earnings.

Craig and Grace Graham

The Grahams are a middle-income retired couple with very excessive medical bills. Craig was an electrician and Grace was a secretary.

Together, they obtain $25,000 a month from Social Security and $50,000 from their 401(okay) financial savings, making for a complete earnings of $75,000. However, Craig’s well being has deteriorated considerably and he needed to enter a nursing residence this yr, which resulted in $50,000 in out-of-pocket medical prices.

Because all of their earnings comes from Social Security and investments—which the proposed reforms don’t change—the Grahams’ tax invoice wouldn’t change underneath both the House or Senate proposals. In every case, they’d owe nothing in federal earnings taxes.

Michael and Sarah Lee

The Lees are a semi-retired, upper-income couple. Michael was a author and Sarah was an legal professional, however each nonetheless do some contract work on the facet.

The Lees have a mixed earnings of $150,000 a yr, consisting of $50,000 in earnings, $50,000 in Social Security advantages, and $50,000 in funding earnings from their 401(okay)s. They have $15,000 in out-of-pocket medical bills, and at present pay $15,613 in federal earnings taxes.

Under the House proposal, they’d pay $1,003 much less (their federal earnings tax invoice could be $14,610), and underneath the Senate proposal they’d pay $2,059 much less (their federal earnings tax invoice could be $13,554). This would imply a 6.4 % tax lower underneath the House proposal and a 13.2 % tax lower underneath the Senate proposal.

Although the Lees’ taxable earnings would go comparatively unchanged underneath each proposals, they’d obtain vital tax cuts underneath each the House and Senate payments as a result of decrease tax charges on their earned earnings.

Hector and Carmen Garcia

The Garcias’ are a rich retired couple. At one time, they collectively operated their very own actual property growth firm, which they’ve since handed on to their youngsters.

The Garcias have gathered vital financial savings, and so they obtain $950,000 in funding earnings annually together with $50,000 in Social Security advantages. The Garcias make beneficiant charitable donations of $100,000 a yr, they’ve $25,000 in medical bills, and so they pay about $79,000 in state and native taxes.

Although the Garcias don’t want all of their earnings to cowl their very own bills, they get pleasure from utilizing their wealth to assist their youngsters with their enterprise ventures, to assist some members of the family who reside outdoors the U.S., and to contribute to every of their 10 grandchildren’s school accounts.

Under the present tax system, the Garcias pay $151,768 in federal earnings taxes. Under the proposed House invoice, their taxes would improve by $12,744 (to $164,512) and underneath the Senate invoice, their taxes would rise by $12,149 (to $163,917).

This would imply an 8.4 % tax improve underneath the House proposal and an 8 % tax improve underneath the Senate proposal. These will increase would come from a lack of their state and native earnings tax deduction and the $10,000 cap on the property tax deduction.

While the Garcias would lose these deductions, they’d hold different deductions—corresponding to for charitable donations—which might be price extra underneath the proposed reform packages as a result of each House and Senate payments would eradicate the phaseout of itemized deductions, which exists within the present tax code.

Good Changes for Most Retirees

Understandably, many retirees could also be involved about how tax reform will have an effect on them. But the naked details of those two tax reform payments must be reassuring: Tax reform, for the overwhelming majority of American seniors, is nice information.

Moreover, though not represented in seniors’ particular person earnings tax payments, the company and small enterprise tax provisions contained within the proposed reforms would profit seniors each by way of their funding incomes and their purchases.

That’s as a result of the advantages of decrease company taxes circulation to people who personal inventory in these firms, employees who’re employed by these firms, and customers who buy items and providers from these firms.

As the House and Senate transfer towards reconciling their two comparable tax payments, American seniors can relaxation assured that this invoice is a win for them.

The publish Most Retirees Would Save Money Because of Tax Reform. Here Are Some Key Examples. appeared first on The Daily Signal.

This article sources info from The Daily Signal

The Inanity of Liberals’ Fearmongering on Tax Reform

On Monday night time, the GOP tax invoice took one other step towards President Donald Trump’s desk when Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wis., named 9 members to the convention committee, together with Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady, R-Texas.

The Senate is predicted to call its negotiators later this week as the 2 chambers work to reconcile their respective variations of the invoice. As the invoice strikes ahead, Democrats have gotten more and more frantic—and apocalyptic—of their efforts to derail tax reform.

“[This bill] is the worst invoice within the historical past of the United States Congress,” claimed House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., throughout House flooring debates on the tax invoice. She clarified later throughout a press convention: “No, it’s the finish of the world … This is Armageddon.”

It’s unclear which components of the GOP tax invoice sign the 4 horsemen of Pelosi’s prophesied apocalypse. Maybe it’s the rise within the youngster tax credit score, which the House bumped as much as $1,600 per youngster (and the Senate raised even additional to $2,000). This laws would supply essential reduction for working households, however for the Democrats, that reduction goes hand in hand with our doom.

Or perhaps Pelosi’s panic is as a result of close to complete elimination of marriage penalties throughout the tax invoice. For many years, married couples have been penalized by a tax code that incentivizes divorce. A divorced couple can usually obtain a greater tax consequence by receiving a tax break for funds between them than a married couple can.

Marriage is the bedrock of our nation’s foundational construction, the household, and solely when our households are sturdy can our economic system thrive. The House GOP members acknowledged this when in addition they decreased the variety of taxable revenue brackets to 4, relatively than the seven at present in regulation.

Another vilified proposal throughout the Republicans’ tax invoice is the assault on the property tax, also referred to as the “dying tax,” which handicaps households, and notably family-owned companies, by imposing closely on bequeathed property.

The House model of the tax invoice doubles the dying tax exclusion and repeals the tax completely starting in 2024, whereas the Senate’s model retains the tax, however doubles the exclusion from 2018-2025.

The Democrats might disagree, however we discover that the dying tax locations an unconscionable onus on small companies, to say nothing of the emotional harm inflicted on grieving households who’re pressured to shut their companies’ doorways, and we hope the ultimate invoice displays the House’s language and absolutely repeals the dying tax.

Pelosi and her compatriots on the left would have the American public imagine that the Republicans are out to assist solely the richest and the most important “fats cats,” as Pelosi known as the rich repeatedly throughout her flooring speeches towards the GOP tax invoice.

The invoice will not be excellent, and we urge members of Congress to incorporate within the closing invoice the House language eradicating the federal government’s muzzle on church buildings by way of the Johnson Amendment, restoring free speech for church buildings and nonprofits.

But regardless of the Democrats’ fearmongering and hyperbolic exclamations, the reality is that this invoice doesn’t spell the top of the world, however relatively the top of an antiquated tax code that has crippled our economic system and positioned an undue burden on our nation’s households for many years.

This was initially printed in Tony Perkins’ Washington Update, which is written with assistance from Family Research Council senior writers.

The submit The Inanity of Liberals’ Fearmongering on Tax Reform appeared first on The Daily Signal.

This article sources data from The Daily Signal

The Differences House, Senate Will Have to Resolve to Advance Tax Reform Bill

Following the Senate’s 51-49 early Saturday morning vote to go Republicans’ tax reform overhaul, the laws will transfer to convention the place the House and Senate will work to resolve their variations.

“I feel the variations are fairly minor between the 2 payments and I feel will likely be fairly simply labored out,” Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., advised The Daily Signal in a cellphone interview.

A senior Republican aide advised The Daily Signal in a cellphone interview that he expects the convention interval will likely be swift, and mentioned he believes a last vote on the plan will likely be “inside one or two days” of the convention report. The Dec. 12 Alabama particular election between Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones can be creating stress for a swift decision. 

Here are some points that may probably be tackled in convention.

Sunsetting the Individual Tax Rate Cuts After 2025

The high precedence for the Republican Study Committee, a caucus of conservative Republican lawmakers within the House of Representatives, is ensuring that particular person tax cuts are everlasting, in line with an e-mail from a staffer of the Republican Study Committee.

The present Senate invoice will finish most particular person revenue tax cuts after 2025, and the Republican Study Committee desires to enhance the invoice by making the cuts everlasting.

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, says the sundown provision is unhealthy coverage.

To sundown the tax cuts is admittedly ridiculous,” Gohmert mentioned, including:

We’re both going to reform the tax code and have tax cuts and assist the financial system, or we’re not. So I might hope that we are literally going to do that, make it everlasting, and power Democrats sooner or later to lift taxes after now we have lowered them. We shouldn’t be elevating taxes again ourselves.

Senate Delayal of Corporate Tax Rates for a Year

Under the Senate invoice, the company tax reduce from the present 35 p.c price to 20 p.c is not going to go into impact till 2019. Some lawmakers wish to make the reduce apply sooner.

“One large difficulty to consider is the delayed … date of the company tax price discount within the Senate plan,” Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., advised The Daily Signal in a cellphone interview. “I feel that members of the House wish to see that instantly, as a result of we predict that is nice for the nation, good for the financial system.”

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, agrees.

“One of the negatives of the Senate invoice is that it delays the implementation of the company tax reduce, I feel that ought to occur immediately,” Jordan mentioned in an interview with The Daily Signal.   

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., mentioned Americans might miss out on the total potential results of tax reform if the reduce within the company price is delayed.

“I want to see these tax cuts retroactive, so actually delays don’t comport with my view on the topic,” Gaetz advised The Daily Signal in a cellphone interview. “A number of the expansion that the president is rightfully taking credit score for is anticipatory, and so if we delay the company tax cuts … the sugar excessive of market expectation might put on off earlier than the caffeine of precise tax cuts can take maintain, and that could be a doldrum Republicans don’t wish to be in, we don’t need the nation to be on this doldrum.”

Rep. Dave Brat, R-Va., advised The Daily Signal in an interview that “the tax cuts are already baked within the cake and markets predict it.”

“So I don’t suppose we will afford to delay any of those tax cuts and we must battle like loopy to decrease the charges … the remainder of it you possibly can haggle and compromise, and so on.,” Brat added. “But that’s the biggie.”  

Alternative Minimum Tax

The House tax plan repeals the choice minimal tax, which “requires many taxpayers to calculate their legal responsibility twice—as soon as beneath the principles for the common revenue tax and as soon as beneath the AMT guidelines—after which pay the upper quantity,” in line with the Tax Policy Center.

The Senate plan retains each the person and company different minimal tax and raises the person exemption threshold.

Gohmert says the Senate ought to observe the House’s instance in repealing the choice minimal tax.

“That was a promise that Republicans have been making, that we’ll do away with the choice minimal tax so that individuals can know what they’re going to be taxed prematurely,” Gohmert mentioned, including:

You make a lot, you’ll pay a lot and never have an alternate bounce in as you’re doing all of your tax returns and let you know, ‘Nope, you’re going to pay rather more than you thought you have been going to pay.’ So we’ve received to do away with the AMT, each House and Senate have been promising that for a very long time, it’s time to make good on the promise.

Repealing the Johnson Amendment

The House tax invoice features a repeal of the Johnson Amendment, a provision that was added to the tax code in 1954 that retains church buildings from endorsing or opposing political candidates, as The Daily Signal beforehand reported. Some lawmakers have expressed help to incorporate a repeal of the modification within the last invoice.

The Senate invoice doesn’t embody a repeal of the Johnson Amendment.

“One of the guarantees made by candidate Trump was to take care of the Johnson Amendment which has been used to threaten church buildings and non secular leaders from talking on political issues for too lengthy,” David Christensen, vice chairman of presidency affairs on the Family Research Council, mentioned in an announcement offered to The Daily Signal in an e-mail, including:

We imagine the White House and Congressional leaders are dedicated to restoring the free speech rights of church buildings and nonprofits and we’re cautiously optimistic this will likely be included within the last model of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. 

Individual Mandate

The Senate model of the tax invoice consists of the repeal of the person Obamacare mandate and a senior Republican aide advised The Daily Signal in a cellphone interview that he expects it gained’t be a “large deal.”

Jordan praised the inclusion of the repeal of the person mandate.

“My hope is that we take the perfect parts of each payments,” Jordan advised The Daily Signal in cellphone interview. “For instance, the Senate invoice has repealed the person mandate, I hope that stays within the last package deal. I feel it should.”

Gohmert mentioned, “Thank God the Senate repealed the Obamacare particular person mandate.”

Following the Senate’s passage of the invoice, the workplace of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., launched an up to date record of 229 companies and different teams which can be backing the laws.

The record included teams like Best Buy, Boeing, Delta Airlines, FedEx, General Electric Company, General Motors, Home Depot, Target, and Verizon.

>>> These 229 Businesses and Groups Support Tax Reform

President Donald Trump, who has mentioned he desires to signal a invoice by Christmas, says he’s assured the laws will spur financial progress.

The submit The Differences House, Senate Will Have to Resolve to Advance Tax Reform Bill appeared first on The Daily Signal.

This article sources info from The Daily Signal

These 229 Businesses and Groups Support Tax Reform

Hundreds of companies and organizations have publicly declared their assist for the Senate’s tax reform bundle, one of many many elements that led to the invoice’s passage early Saturday morning on a 51-49 vote.

The checklist, launched by the workplace of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., contains 229 companies and different teams which might be backing the laws.

The checklist contains many family names similar to Best Buy, Boeing, Delta Airlines, FedEx, General Electric, General Motors, Home Depot, Target, and Verizon.

The Senate tax plan is probably the most important rewrite of the tax code in 31 years. It reduces the company tax price, at the moment at 35 %, to 20 %. For these with pass-through companies—entities which might be “taxed on the enterprise proprietor’s tax returns by the person earnings tax code,” in line with the Tax Foundation—there’s a 23 % tax deduction.

>>> In 1 Chart, the Differences Between the House and Senate Tax Reform Bills

President Donald Trump, who has mentioned he desires to signal a invoice by Christmas, tweeted his optimism for the house stretch of passing tax reform.

A full checklist of the 229 teams and companies in assist of the Senate’s tax plan is beneath:

  1. 21st Century Fox
  2. 3M
  3. 45Committee
  4. 60 Plus
  5. A. O. Smith Corporation
  6. Aerospace Industries Association
  7. Aetna
  8. Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI)
  9. Airlines for America
  10. Alaska Chamber
  11. ALEC Action
  12. Alliance for Competitive Taxation (ACT)
  13. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
  14. Allstate Insurance
  15. Altria
  16. American Action Network (AAN)
  17. American Airlines
  18. American Commitment
  19. American Conservative Union (ACU)
  20. American Craft Spirits Association
  21. American Dental Association (ADA)
  22. American Exploration & Production Council (AXPC)
  23. American Farm Bureau Federation
  24. American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA)
  25. American Forest Foundation
  26. American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM)
  27. American Gaming Association
  28. American Gas Association (AGA)
  29. American Hotels and Lodging Association (AH&LA)
  30. American Made Coalition
  31. American Petroleum Institute (API)
  32. American Trucking Associations (ATA)
  33. Americans for Limited Government (ALG)
  34. Americans for Prosperity (AFP)
  35. Americans for Tax Reform (ATR)
  36. Amgen
  37. Arizona Retailers Association
  38. Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC)
  39. Associated Industries of Missouri (AIM)
  40. Association of American Railroads
  41. Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM)
  42. Association of Global Automakers
  43. Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC)
  44. AT&T
  45. Baxter Healthcare
  46. Beer Institute
  47. Best Buy
  48. Boeing
  49. BP
  50. Brown-Forman
  51. Business Roundtable
  52. Celgene
  53. Center for Freedom and Prosperity
  54. Center for Worker Freedom
  55. Charter Communications
  56. Christian Coalition of America
  57. Cincinnati Financial Corporation (The Cincinnati Insurance Companies)
  58. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  59. Club for Growth
  60. Coalition for American Insurance
  61. Coalition of Franchisee Associations
  62. Comcast
  63. Concerned Veterans for America
  64. ConocoPhillips
  65. Constellation Brands
  66. Construction Industry Roundtable (CIRT)
  67. Consumer Action for a Strong Economy (CASE)
  68. Consumer Mortgage Coalition (CMC)
  69. Consumer Technology Association
  70. Continental Resources
  71. Cost Recovery Advances the Nation’s Economy (CRANE) Coalition
  72. Council for the Citizens Against Government Waste
  73. Cox Enterprises
  74. Crossroads GPS
  75. CSX Transportation
  76. CTIA – Everything Wireless
  77. Delta Air Lines
  78. Digital Liberty
  79. Distilled Spirits Council
  80. Domestic Energy Producers Alliance (DEPA)
  81. Dow Chemical Company
  82. East Kentucky Power Cooperative (EKPC)
  83. Eastman
  84. Edison Electric Institute (EEI)
  85. Electronic Transactions Association
  86. Eli Lilly and Company
  87. Entertainment Software Association (ESA)
  88. Exelon Corporation
  89. ExxonMobil
  90. Faith and Freedom Coalition
  91. Family Business Coalition
  92. FedEx
  93. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
  94. Fidelity Investments
  95. Financial Services Roundtable
  96. Florida Retail Federation
  97. Food Marketing Institute
  98. Ford Motor Company
  99. Franchise Business Services
  100. Freedom Partners
  101. FreedomWorks
  102. General Dynamics
  103. General Electric Company
  104. General Motors
  105. Generation Opportunity
  106. Georgia Retail Association
  107. Grassfire
  108. Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA)
  109. HCCW CEO Economic Leadership Committee
  110. HDR, Inc.
  111. Here For America
  112. Heritage Action for America
  113. Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  114. Hilton Hotels & Resorts
  115. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Wisconsin
  116. Hispanic Leadership Fund
  117. Home Depot
  118. Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA)
  119. Honeywell
  120. Houchens Industries
  121. Independent Bakers Association (IBA)
  122. Independent Women’s Voice
  123. Indiana Retail Council
  124. Industrial Minerals Association – North America (IMA-NA)
  125. Information Technology Industry Council
  126. Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
  127. Institute for Liberty
  128. Intel Corporation
  129. International Bank of Commerce
  130. International Franchise Association
  131. International Paper
  132. International Sign Association
  133. Job Creators Network
  134. Johnson & Johnson
  135. Kansas Chamber of Commerce
  136. Kentucky Chamber of Commerce
  137. Kentucky Distillers’ Association (KDA)
  138. Knight-Swift Transportation
  139. Koch Industries
  140. Latino Coalition
  141. Lennox International Inc.
  142. Liberty Counsel Action
  143. Liberty Mutual Insurance
  144. Lockheed Martin Corporation
  145. Mars, Incorporated
  146. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
  147. McKesson Corporation
  148. Merck
  149. Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce
  150. Michigan Retailers Association
  151. Montana Retail Association
  152. Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA)
  153. Nareit
  154. National Alliance of Forest Owners (NAFO)
  155. National Association of Broadcasters (NAB)
  156. National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)
  157. National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)
  158. National Federation of Independent Business, Pennsylvania chapter (NFIB-PA)
  159. National Franchisee Association
  160. National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA)
  161. National Mining Association
  162. National Pork Producers Council
  163. National Restaurant Association
  164. National Retail Federation (NRF)
  165. National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA)
  166. National Tax Limitation Committee
  167. National Taxpayers Union (NTU)
  168. NCTA – The Internet & Television Association
  169. Nebraska Retail Federation
  170. Niskanen Center
  171. Norfolk Southern Corporation
  172. North American Meat Institute (NAMI)
  173. North Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association
  174. North Dakota Propane Gas Association
  175. North Dakota Retail Association
  176. Ohio Council of Retail Merchants
  177. ON Semiconductor
  178. One Nation
  179. Oracle
  180. Pennsylvania Chamber of Commerce
  181. Pennsylvania Manufacturers Association
  182. Pfizer
  183. Pitney Bowes
  184. Procter & Gamble
  185. Property Casualty Insurers Association of America
  186. Property Rights Alliance
  187. RATE Coalition
  188. Raytheon Company
  189. Retail Association of Nevada
  190. Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA)
  191. Reynolds American, Inc.
  192. Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA)
  193. Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (SBE Council)
  194. Smithfield Foods Inc.
  195. Smiths Group
  196. Southern Company
  197. Southwest Airlines
  198. Target
  199. Taxpayers Protection Alliance
  200. Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund
  201. TechNet
  202. Tennessee Chamber of Commerce & Industry
  203. Tennessee Manufacturers Association
  204. Texas Association of Business
  205. Texas Instruments
  206. Texas Retailers Association
  207. The Kroger Company
  208. The LIBRE Initiative
  209. The Silicon Valley Organization
  210. Total System Services (TSYS)
  211. Toyota
  212. Travelers Companies, Inc.
  213. Truckload Carriers Association
  214. Tyson Foods
  215. U.S. Chamber of Commerce
  216. Union Pacific
  217. United Airlines
  218. United Parcel Service (UPS)
  219. United Technologies Corporation (UTC)
  220. USTelecom
  221. Varian
  222. Verizon
  223. Viacom
  224. Volvo Car Corporation
  225. Walmart
  226. Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of America (WSWA)
  227. Wireless Infrastructure Association
  228. Wisconsin CEO Economic & Workforce Leadership Coalition
  229. Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce (WMC)

The publish These 229 Businesses and Groups Support Tax Reform appeared first on The Daily Signal.

This article sources info from The Daily Signal