Google’s battle in opposition to human trafficking

Google has made it a precedence to deal with the heinous crime of intercourse trafficking. I do know, as a result of I’ve labored on this from the day I joined in 2012. We have employed and funded advocates on this space. We have developed and constructed in depth know-how to attach victims with the sources they want. And we’ve got helped pioneer using applied sciences that determine trafficking networks to make it simpler and faster for regulation enforcement to arrest these abusers. You can examine these efforts right here. We’ve supported over 40 payments on human trafficking. And we’re decided to do extra to cease this evil, together with help for more durable laws. 

There is at present a debate over a proposed invoice to fight intercourse trafficking by amending part 230 of the Communications Decency Act. While we agree with the intentions of the invoice, we’re involved that it erodes the “good samaritan” safety and would really hinder the battle in opposition to intercourse trafficking. While giant corporations usually tend to proceed their proactive enforcement efforts and may afford to battle lawsuits, if smaller platforms are made chargeable for “information” of human trafficking occurring on their platforms, there’s a threat that some will search to keep away from that “information”; they may merely cease searching for it. This can be a catastrophe. We assume it’s significantly better to foster an setting through which all know-how corporations can proceed to wash their platforms and help efficient instruments for regulation enforcement and advocacy organizations to seek out and disrupt these networks. We’ve met with the sponsors of the actual invoice and supplied alternate options that may encourage this setting, and we’ll proceed to hunt a constructive strategy to advance a shared objective.

We’re not alone on this view. Organizations as broad and various as Engine Advocacy, PEN America, Charles Koch Institute, Heritage Action, ACLU, U.S. Chamber Technology Engagement Center, Business Software Alliance, Internet Commerce Coalition, Internet Association (whose members embody Microsoft, Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, Snap, Match.com, Pinterest, and so on.), TechFreedom, Medium, GitHub, Reddit, Wikimedia, National Venture Capital Association and lots of others have raised issues in regards to the invoice. We—and lots of others—stand able to work with Congress on modifications to the invoice, and on different laws and measures to battle human trafficking and shield and help victims and survivors.

A number of the dialogue round this challenge focuses on the function of an internet site known as Backpage.com. I need to make our place on this clear. Google believes that Backpage.com can and ought to be held accountable for its crimes. We strongly applaud the work of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations in exposing Backpage’s intentional promotion of kid intercourse trafficking by advertisements. Based on these findings, Google believes that Backpage.com ought to be criminally prosecuted by the US Department of Justice for facilitating youngster intercourse trafficking, one thing they’ll do at the moment with out must amend any legal guidelines. And years earlier than the Senate’s investigation and report, we prohibited Backpage from promoting on Google, and we’ve got criticized Backpage publicly.

I perceive that when essential laws is being mentioned, public debate is strong. That’s the way it ought to be. But on the essential challenge of intercourse trafficking, we’ve been a deeply dedicated companion within the battle. Let’s not let a real disagreement over the possible unintended impression of a specific piece of laws obscure that truth.

This article sources data from The Keyword