They’re not with us, however I can nonetheless keep in mind them marching each Fourth of July parade once I was a child.

Sadly, all that is still of our World War I veterans are some fading reminiscences and the historic memorials to their dedication. And if atheists have their approach, the memorials will quickly be light from historical past as properly.

Last week, the American Humanist Association acquired one step nearer to that aim, because of a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

After duking it out within the courts for a half-decade, the battle over a 92-year-old cross in Bladensburg, Maryland, took one other twist when two liberal activists chucked the First Amendment in favor of their very own anti-faith bias.

In a 33-page opinion, the bulk insists that the 40-foot monument “aggrandizes the Latin cross … the core image of Christianity.”

But amazingly, it’s not the image that bothers them—however its dimension. “Here it’s 40 toes tall; prominently displayed within the heart of one of many busiest intersections in Prince George’s County, Maryland, and maintained with hundreds of dollars in authorities funds.”

Chief Judge Roger Gregory may solely shake his head in amazement, questioning in his dissent what that needed to do with something.

“In the bulk’s view, the memorial is unconstitutional primarily based predominantly on the dimensions of the cross, and neither its secular options nor historical past may overcome the presumption. But such a conclusion is opposite to our constitutional directive.”

Built in 1925, the cross was meant to honor 49 Prince George’s County residents who died in World War I. Words like “valor,” “endurance,” “braveness,” and “devotion” are chiseled into the monument’s base as a reminder of the sacrifice it takes to defend freedom—the identical freedom, paradoxically, this court docket is denying.

Like a variety of veterans, our pals at First Liberty Institute, who’re representing the American Legion, are involved about what the ruling means for different shows—just like the rows of crosses marking troopers’ graves at Arlington Cemetery.

As traditional, the court docket’s reasoning is totally selective—and subjective. Asked how they might justify this response when Arlington can be federally funded, the judges fumbled round for a solution.

“The crosses there,” the bulk tried to elucidate, “are a lot smaller than the 40-foot-tall monolith at difficulty right here. And, considerably, Arlington National Cemetery shows numerous spiritual symbols, each as monuments and on particular person headstones.”

Apparently, the judges like their legal guidelines like they like their buffets: a la carte.

First Liberty legal professional Jeremy Dys is as pissed off as the remainder of us that the American Humanist Association is just too busy being offended to contemplate our service members’ needs.

“I feel it’s very discouraging for the hundreds of veterans throughout the nation who’ve mainly been informed their conflict memorials are suspect if any spiritual imagery seems close to them,” Dys stated. “I feel it’s necessary that we honor veterans the best way that veterans select to honor themselves.”

After all, these memorials are much more than items of granite. They’re America’s approach of telling an necessary story.

It’s the identical precept within the Old Testament, when leaders would construct piles of stones to remind future generations about God’s faithfulness. Like Bladensburg, when the reminiscences had light they needed their kids and grandchildren to see these monuments and ask what they meant.

Now, atheists are working extra time to rewrite that historical past and sandblast the function of religion in America. They’ve already chipped away on the substance—taking prayer and the Bible out of faculties. Now they need the symbols too.

As George Orwell warns in “1984,” “He who controls the current controls the previous; he who controls the previous controls the longer term.”

This ruling is precisely the type of harmful precedent Christians must cease. Kelly Shackelford’s First Liberty Institute is actually making an attempt. If which means taking this struggle all the best way to the Supreme Court, they’re prepared.

Originally printed in Tony Perkins’ “Washington Update,” which is written with assistance from Family Research Council senior writers.

The put up Militant Atheist Group Using Liberal Court to Tear Down a Memorial Cross appeared first on The Daily Signal.

This article sources data from The Daily Signal