“T.J.” and Matt are homosexual, however they assist the Colorado bakery proprietor combating a authorized battle for his proper, on non secular grounds, to refuse to make marriage ceremony muffins for same-sex .

Standing exterior the Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Colorado, the bakery on the heart of the courtroom case that goes earlier than the Supreme Court on Dec. 5, they defined why they assist its proprietor, Jack Phillips.

“We’re right here to purchase stuff from him,” Matt mentioned, in a video he and T.J. made for Alliance Defending Freedom, “and assist him, as a result of we don’t suppose any artist needs to be pressured to create for one thing that violates their beliefs.”

The Scottsdale, Arizona-based Alliance Defending Freedom, a nonprofit authorized group that litigates for non secular liberty, will characterize Phillips in that Supreme Court listening to in December.

The authorized group posted T.J. and Matt’s video on its Facebook web page Monday.


A second video, posted Tuesday, options Kristen Waggoner, the ADF lawyer who will characterize Phillips on the Supreme Court subsequent month.

Waggoner says in her video that defending Phillips’ case represents defending not simply his however everybody else’s proper to free expression and free train of their non secular religion.

“If we wish freedom of expression for ourselves,” Waggoner says, “if we wish the free train of faith for ourselves, then we have now to assist that proper for others, even these we disagree with.

“We additionally know that civil liberties journey collectively,” she continued, noting that even when somebody doesn’t care about non secular freedom, “if we care about financial liberty … what we are able to see from different international locations that don’t have non secular freedom, is additionally they don’t have sturdy freedom in different areas.

“So we sink or swim collectively, it doesn’t matter what our beliefs are on marriage, and this case will have an effect on all of us.”

Phillips’ case started in 2012, when a gay couple filed a grievance with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission towards him after he declined to make a marriage cake for them.

An administrative legislation decide dominated towards Phillips in December 2013, “saying that designing and creating muffins for same-sex marriage ceremony ceremonies aren’t speech protected by the First Amendment,” in line with the ADF’s web site.

“The fee ordered Jack and his employees to both violate Jack’s religion by designing customized marriage ceremony muffins that commemorate same-sex marriages or cease designing all marriage ceremony muffins, which was roughly 40 p.c of Jack’s enterprise.”

The ADF appealed Phillips’ case, and the Supreme Court introduced in June that it might hear the enchantment.

The submit 2 Gay Men Explain Why They Support Baker’s Refusal to Make Same-Sex Wedding Cakes appeared first on The Daily Signal.

This article sources info from The Daily Signal